The proposed law was defeated by a brilliant "stealth" tactic by the Socialist Party minority. The UMP Party believed that the law would pass easily with their majority, as they have been accustomed to since Sarkozy took office, so the session was very poorly attended. When the vote came up, the toom was mearly empty and suddenly, in force, the Socialists came in and voted as a block, defeating the law handlely.
Of course, the UMP was "outraged" by this tactic and has spent their energy denouncing the Socialists for defeating a very repressive law that nobody wanted but the corporate interests that the UMP represents.
This is a formidable victory for all citizens. This vote shows that it is still possible to make oneself heard. It is a fantastic example of how to use the Net to fight against those who are trying to control it. Individual liberties, in the end, have not been sacrificed to try to preserve the corporate interests of some obsolete industries. The HADOPI law has been interred earlier than expected.Nonetheless, La Quadrature du Net asks its supportes to remain vigilant. The rejection of HADOPI doesn't mean the end of the government's attempts to control the Internet. We must continue to make use of our collective intelligence and the power of the net to preserve justice and the truth.
Despite the approval of the French recording industry and prominent musicians, including Johnny Hallyday, some attacked the measure.Civil liberties campaigners and members of the Socialist party said the new surveillance powers were tantamount to "the criminalisation of an entire generation".
Others had said it could end up punishing the wrong people, for instance parents whose children download in secret or employers whose staff use computers at work to break the law.
Breaking ranks from many of their artistic colleagues, a group of French directors and actors including Catherine Deneuve issued an open letter of protest this week.
"The law comes in response to legitimate concerns which we all share - concerns that we will see our work devalued and degraded," they wrote. "However this law ... is merely imposing a punitive system whose constitutionality is dubious and practicality unclear."
3 comments:
I "borrow" photos and videos, sometimes failing to give the source. Does that count?
Yes, Mike, and remember this commandment: 'Borrow not lest ye be unplugged.'
Wonderful, Mudrake!
This goes so deep into the evolution of our elctronic conciousness and how ideas and media are changing at an exponential rate.
To try to regulate any part of this cultural, cerebral, technicological phenomena is to instantly join the ranks of failed evolutionary models, like say, eryops, the first giant salamanders which woalked on land.
Yesterday, AP tried to sue one of it's associated stations for using a video it had posted on its own YouTube Channel.
Now the legal end of AP which initiated the legal proceedings didn't even know that AP had it's own YouTube "channel" or that it posted videos with embed codes.
Could you re read that and tell me where to begin to find all of the holes in the logic?
Post a Comment